Re: [UUPoly-L] Fidelity Bashing [was Re: Promiscuity Bashing]

To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] Fidelity Bashing [was Re: Promiscuity Bashing]
From: JasmineGld@aol.com
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:11:24 -0000
Reply-to: uupoly-l@uupa.org

In a message dated 2/23/2006 9:58:59 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
taanderson@mac.com writes:

> I find the vehement insistence that Poly does mean 
> "promiscuous" to be more than a little annoying, 
> even  offensive.

I didn't see the vehement insistence you refer to.  Can you please  quote it? 

Thanks, 
Jasmine

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [UUPoly-L] Fidelity Bashing [was Re: Promiscuity Bashing]
  - From: Thomas Anderson <taanderson@mac.com>

Previous by Date: [UUPoly-L] Fidelity Bashing [was Re: Promiscuity Bashing]
Next by Date: [UUPoly-L] Thanks for an excellent post, Thomas!
Previous by Thread: Re:[UUPoly-L] Female Submissives
Next by Thread: Re: [UUPoly-L] Fidelity Bashing [was Re: Promiscuity Bashing]
UUPoly-L February 2006 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
UUPoly-L list archive Table of Contents
More information about the UUPoly-L mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.