[UUPoly-L] Re:Exodus



I would expect that UUs would express their reasons and objections rather than just exiting a discussion on any topic!

Bonfire

-----Original Message-----
From: uupoly-l-request@uupa.org
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Sent: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:00:31 -0500
Subject: UUPoly-L Digest, Vol 17, Issue 28

 Send UUPoly-L mailing list submissions to
   uupoly-l@uupa.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   uupoly-l-request@uupa.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
   uupoly-l-owner@uupa.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of UUPoly-L digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Exodus (lisamorgan)
  2. Re: Exodus (Jason Klueber)
  3. Re: Exodus (Mr Y)
  4. Re: Thanks for an excellent post, Thomas! (Sally Amsbury)
  5. Re: Thanks for an excellent post, Thomas! (Sally Amsbury)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:31:45 -0500
From: lisamorgan <lisamorgan@lairhaven.com>
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] Exodus
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Message-ID: <bf4521b2ebd637f5c803c5dedcada41e@lairhaven.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


Not sure what you mean by the question, Jason. I am not into BDSM, but I was following the conversations with interest just to learn something new.


Lisa


-----Original message----- From: "Jason Klueber" jason.klueber@gmail.com Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:16:00 -0500 To: uupoly-l@uupa.org Subject: [UUPoly-L] Exodus

Anyone else feeling marginalized by the exodus of members, following
the BDSM topic?

--J, who didn't reply to the thread for this very reason

--
Jason Klueber

"Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions."
- GK Chesterton

"Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of
scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is
already settled."
--Michael Crichton

_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has publicarchives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about
yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l


Lisa Z. Morgan lisamorgan@lairhaven.com http://www.lairhaven.com



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:38:45 -0500
From: "Jason Klueber" <jason.klueber@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] Exodus
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Message-ID:
   <e7228d7c0602271138y31a954e9y1df269c9bbd53e03@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 2/27/06, lisamorgan <lisamorgan@lairhaven.com> wrote:
Not sure what you mean by the question, Jason. I am not into BDSM, but
I was following the conversations with interest just to learn
something new.

I was just surprised by having two members respond to one of the threads with requests to unsubscribe. That's all.

Probably should've kept my mouth shut.  As it were.  ;)

--
Jason Klueber

"Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions."
    - GK Chesterton

"Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of
scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is
already settled."
   --Michael Crichton



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:47:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Mr Y <ystradyfodwg@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] Exodus
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Message-ID: <20060227214727.13528.qmail@web54410.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I am not feeling marginalized...
I think that we, as a group, should be able to discuss - and disagree - on any
topic
that deals with the myriad facets of living a poly life in society.


 Arguments - in the acedemic sense - are learning opportunities.
 We may all have diverse and divergent opinions but that should
 not make us adversaries.

 Mr Y
El Rhondda Ystradyfodwg
Paganus Apostasia Antinomus Scepticus
 "Golud Gwlad Rhyddid"


Jason Klueber <jason.klueber@gmail.com> wrote: Anyone else feeling marginalized by the exodus of members, following the BDSM topic?

--J, who didn't reply to the thread for this very reason

--
Jason Klueber

"Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions."
- GK Chesterton

"Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of
scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is
already settled."
--Michael Crichton

_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l




---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail  makes sharing a breeze.

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:29:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Sally Amsbury <sallyam@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] Thanks for an excellent post, Thomas!
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Message-ID: <20060227222926.35538.qmail@web81102.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

What he said.

Either we are caring about each other, doing what we want, helping each other,
being as happy as we want to be and helping others to be as happy as they can
be, interested in each other and ourselves, open and honest so we can all make
informed choises


or we are that other thing no one should have to be(hurt, terrified[as most
abusers], depressed, without awareness of choices) and everyone should be
informed and empowered that they don't have to be.


 Blessings,
           Sally

bear@pagansexcult.org wrote:


On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Maka Laughingwolf wrote:

I think this is the key - agreeing to differ, and letting each person
decide for zirself whether or not zie identifies as poly, without
judging zir choices.

I guess I'm a "big tent" poly; as far as I'm concerned *all* sexual behavior
falls into (at least) one of four categories. And my categories are


1) Abusive
2) Monogamous
3) Polyamorous
4) Celibate

If you pick three that it ain't, welcome, at least as I see it, to the fourth.

And FWIW, polyamorous and monogamous have more in common with each other than
any other pair on the list. Teeny distinctions within polyamorous, like
polyfide versus swinger versus (non-abusive) religious polygyny, are a tempest
in a teacup IMO; they make as little account to me as the distinction between
non-masturbating and masturbating celibacy.


Bear

_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l





------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:30:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Sally Amsbury <sallyam@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] Thanks for an excellent post, Thomas!
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Message-ID: <20060227223019.54694.qmail@web81111.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

What he said.

Either we are caring about each other, doing what we want, helping each other,
being as happy as we want to be and helping others to be as happy as they can
be, interested in each other and ourselves, open and honest so we can all make
informed choises


or we are that other thing no one should have to be(hurt, terrified[as most
abusers], depressed, without awareness of choices) and everyone should be
informed and empowered that they don't have to be.


 Blessings,
           Sally

bear@pagansexcult.org wrote:


On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Maka Laughingwolf wrote:

I think this is the key - agreeing to differ, and letting each person
decide for zirself whether or not zie identifies as poly, without
judging zir choices.

I guess I'm a "big tent" poly; as far as I'm concerned *all* sexual behavior
falls into (at least) one of four categories. And my categories are


1) Abusive
2) Monogamous
3) Polyamorous
4) Celibate

If you pick three that it ain't, welcome, at least as I see it, to the fourth.

And FWIW, polyamorous and monogamous have more in common with each other than
any other pair on the list. Teeny distinctions within polyamorous, like
polyfide versus swinger versus (non-abusive) religious polygyny, are a tempest
in a teacup IMO; they make as little account to me as the distinction between
non-masturbating and masturbating celibacy.


Bear

_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l





------------------------------

_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l



End of UUPoly-L Digest, Vol 17, Issue 28 ****************************************






This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.