Re: [UUPoly-L] UUCA: welcoming congregation
In a message dated 12/1/2006 7:45:59 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
imapolygirl@yahoo.com writes:
> If we had committed UU swingers who wanted to join
> together with us in UUPoly advocacy, that approach
> might be different, but we don't to my knowledge.
Actually, we do have some list members who identify as swingers and have
some interest in working with UUPoly advocacy, or at least some interest in
keeping an eye on what poly UUs are doing and whether we extend to swingers the
same respect we desire for polys.
Laura Stewart <_lonelocust@gmail.com_ (mailto:lonelocust@gmail.com) > wrote:
> Educating people about the difference in swingers
> and poly people is important.
Easier said than done. There are a wide variety of ways in which to engage
in polyamory, and there are also a wide variety of ways to engage in swinging.
Depending on which of those ways a given person is talking about, poly and
swinging might be completely different or virtually indistinguishable. And if
the speaker and the listener have different ways in mind during the
conversation, it can lead to miscommunication, hurt feelings, and damaged
relationships.
Anita writes:
> If challenged about "those dirty swingers" , we can react
> neutrally and point out that we aren't talking about swinging,
> we're talking about polyamory.
Directing the conversation back to polyamory is the safest response. As
polys, our expertise, such as it is, is about polyamory. We have no expertise in
swinging, and we should keep that limitation in mind. For this reason, I
prefer not to include, "which is a very different kind of non-monogamy," because
(1) I don't have enough expertise to speak about swinging and (2) I believe
it's much more complicated than this comment implies. If pressed, I will state
that my personal understanding of swinging is very limited, and return to
"the issue for UUs right now is polyamory."
Depending on context, I might point out that my academic understanding of
swinging does not support the "those dirty swingers" comment. The reason is
that I have some concerns about implied agreement if I don't respond at all.
Jasmine
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.