From: wabaldwin@aol.com
Reply-To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] UUCA: welcoming congregation
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:47:57 -0500
Okay, I guess we're doing the "Analogy Thing".
;^)
I like to drink tea. But I don't always want to drink tea. I like some
teas and don't like other teas. I like tea at certain times of the day (but
not all times). I only drink a certain amount of tea each day. I don't
drink tea constantly.
If someone else drank other tea or drank it at different times or places
than I do, I wouldn't mind.
But I assert my own freedom to choose when and where I drink the tea,
what kind of tea I drink, and how often. If someone wants to drink tea with
me, and I don't feel like it, I might say "No Thank You" -- while still
agreeing that tea is a wonderful drink.
I do like tea, but I don't know that I would say that tea was "inherently
good". It's just tea. But I do feel I'm "tea-positive" -- and I do enjoy
tea.
I've just read the above over again -- and it pretty well describes my
relationship with sex, too.
Comments?
Bill (drinking a morning cup of "Prince of Wales" tea...fyi..)
(ps -- UUPoly -- and UUs generally -- definitely an interesting "cool"
place to hang out. I've often wondered, who *wouldn't* UU's allow to join
their congregations? For myself, I would definitely allow in polys,
swingers, BDSM, and so on. As, I think, would many of you. We've had all of
the above at our South Bay Poly meetings. Hoping my "ps" doesn't turn out
to be more important than my original message above...<grin>)
-----Original Message-----
From: earthfather@cfnc.us
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Sent: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 5:40 AM
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] UUCA: welcoming congregation
> -----Original Message-----
> From: WABaldwin@aol.com
> In no way do I think that sex per se is bad.
>
> So, even though I don't think sex is always a good idea, I do think that
sex
> is a wonderful activity -- and so I consider myself sex-positive.
For me, being sex-positive means that sex is *inherently* good; but there
are
"outside" factors that can make a particular sexual situation not the best
choice, such as significant danger to one's health, a violation of one's
commitments, etc.
Think about giving someone a shoulder rub (consensually, of course): it is
*inherently* a loving act, giving pleasure to another, as well as the
pleasure
of seeing the delight you can deliver. The shoulder rub is *inherently* a
good
thing, and unless some outside factor radically alters the nature of the
interaction, it is a mitzvah, a sacrament, an expression of agape.
Likewise with sex: I assume that each mutually consensual sexual
opportunity
is a plus, a gift to both parties, a precious opportunity.
Michael Rios
_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security
tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web,
free AOL Mail and more.
_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l