Re: [UUPoly-L] Too many circles, lines, triangles.....
1. The practice of poly, swinging, etc. This would be the formal
definitions, i. e. the Morning Glory Zell definition of poly which is
roughly multiple, concurrent, consensual, sexual, loving, relationships.
I would even drop "sexual" from the list there. I don't see any requirement
that they be sexual though they certainly can be. I have an intimate
relationship with J that used to be sexual, but we brought that to a close,
and we continue just as intimate, without being sexual.
2. Practioners of poly, etc. I think it is both vastly oversimplified
and promotes poor critical thinking to talk about polys and swingers
as if they were both homogenous groups and mutually exclusive.
Well, my wife and I belong to both communities, so by "white crow rule"...
:)
We know a swing and D/s couple who is looking to go poly.
3. The culture associated with or imagined with the practice. Some of
us associate various cultural trappings with "polys", and I think
this needs to be looked at objectively. It may be true that people
who are science fiction fans, pagans, liberals, UU's, etc are often
found in the poly community, but all these cultural attributes are
not definitive of or necessary to the practice of polyamory. It is
formally possible that someone could practice polyamory, ie have poly
relationships and also be an adulterer, rapist, or even a Republican.
Hmm.. What's our net look like?
J married to D, OSO to L, married to me, oso to K, and me also to J
J D L Me K J
Pagan, Pagan, christian, atheist, deist, Evangelical christian
+SF +SF -SF +SF +SF -SF
Dem Lib Canadian Cons Lib Lib
SF is how I first heard of poly (heinlein) but of course not by that name.
It seemed to me then, back in the 70's, that this is how things should be,
but I never expected it to actually be REAL. Took way too long to discover
it. :(
Words of wisdom from popeye the sailor man: "I yam what I yam, and that's
all what I yam."
:) It's so easy to get caught up in the labels, and attach all sorts of
meanings to them that aren't necessarily true for a given person.
In each direction it's a continuum, and all we can really hope to do is get
up a useful shorthand to express our preferences.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.