Re: [UUPoly-L] Another Model (was: Too many circles, lines, triangles.....)

["Timothy McKee" <mknd17@hotmail.com>]

Having brought up the phrase astral sex only once in my six years on this 
listserv, and knowing that there may be at least two definitions of astral 
sex, I seem to have about 246 or 1134 types of relating to other people. In 
the donjuanmatusian description of astral sex, the male sexual organ is the 
solar plexus. Enough Dr. Ruth for one day, and the female ground zero is the 
pubic bone.

But having had to deal with a femme fatale extrordinaire 13 years ago, I 
still identify as hoodoo eunuch, so asexual polyamory  is my nom de plume, 
or primary sexual orientation. Retrosexual may be another, but I am not 
complaining about that. Now for ubersexual and mono,and omni and anti and 
para. Where do you go in your Eckankar dreaming body, Alice? Not Kansas, we 
know that.

Watever floats your boat.  shee,she.

Oh yes, I did meet Ellie's parents in a dream, and Ellie is very mono and 
that's just the way I like it. Ellie ain't fussing and you ain't either.

Tim


> From: John Ullman <jsu627@earthlink.net>
> Reply-To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
> To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
> Subject: [UUPoly-L] Another Model (was: Too many circles, 
> lines,triangles.....)
> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 06:57:06 -0800
>
> I'd like to propose a different way to contrast multiple partner
> relationships. I think a grid or table of concepts and their
> attributes would be more useful than diagrams. For example:
>
> concept multiple        consensual      concurrent      sexual  loving
> mono                                    x                       x       x
> serial mono     x                       x                       x       x
> platonic        x                       x               x               x
> swinging        x                       x               x       x
> poly            x                       x               x       x       x
> adultery        x                                       x       x       ?
> rape            x                                       x       x
>
>
> x =  an attribute that is essential to the concept. My apologies if
> the x's don't wind up making sense in your email reader, but I think
> this presents the idea at least.
>
> ? = I like the Heinlein definition of love, more or less. Deciding
> whether someone who says they are in love "really" is in love may be
> fodder for another discussion.
>
> John U
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
> Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
> UUPoly-L mailing list
> UUPoly-L@uupa.org
> http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l