Re: [UUPoly-L] a useful word



An odd perspective, but what do other cultures call the extended (and
accepted) parental units?

--Maya


On 7/29/06, Timothy McKee <mknd17@hotmail.com> wrote:

I wrote to my 31 year old daughter in late June to wish her uncle a belated surrogate father's day. I guess surrogate fits the bill as he and his wife have been very active in raising my three children.

Tim


>From: "Brigitte Fires" <brigittefires@gmail.com> >Reply-To: uupoly-l@uupa.org >To: uupoly-l@uupa.org >Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] a useful word >Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 03:49:32 -0400 > >I like the term alloparent, from the standpoint that 'godparent' always >felt >fake to me. I was, as I put it, "playing mommy" to a little girl from the >time she was 2+ until she was 5+. I was certainly more involved in her life >and had more of a vested interest than a simple godparent would, amd while >I >also said I was her "future stepmother" while her father and I were engaged >for a while, I always longed for a term that would most accurately describe >our situation. > >Similarly, someone mentioned that the term demands explanation. I suppose, >because I was constantly explaining our situation anyway, that wouldn't >bother me, and having an actual term for the relationship would, I feel, >validate it more in the eyes of those who simply thought I was trying to >take the place of the child's neglectful mother. Even if it meant >explaining >the term for a while. > >I intend for my biological children to be raised primarily by myself and >their father or mother, but do not assume that other people I may be in >long-term relationships with will not take a parenting role to children >that >aren't their own. Just as I will probably end up in a parenting role to >children involved in my relationships. Having an actual scientific term for >that I feel will definately help to validate that relationship when it >comes >to dealing with doctors, teachers, etc., down the line. > >I suppose what I'm saying is, if you're in a situation where you can >withstand the close scrutiny without danger, then having to explain the >term >isn't necessarily a bad thing, if it ends in more accurate understanding. >If >you need a quick answer for the inevitable question of "Who are you and why >do you care?" perhaps a more mainstream term is needed, if less accurate in >truth. > >Brigitte >_______________________________________________ >The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives. >Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself. >UUPoly-L mailing list >UUPoly-L@uupa.org >http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l


_______________________________________________ The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives. Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself. UUPoly-L mailing list UUPoly-L@uupa.org http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l





This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.