Re: [UUPoly-L] previous appeal
Valerie--
The letter from this person suggests an *extremely* disturbed individual.
It may well have evidentiary value as to his fitness as a parent.
Michael Rios
> -----Original Message-----
> From: uupoly-l-bounces+earthfather=cfnc.us@uupa.org [mailto:uupoly-l-
> bounces+earthfather=cfnc.us@uupa.org] On Behalf Of Valerie White
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:49 AM
> To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
> Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] previous appeal
>
> At 09:40 AM 9/12/2006, you wrote:
> >Dear Valerie:
> >
> >After reading your livejournal entry posting on this case, I will have to
> >inform you that there is no reason to think this situation is even about
> >polyamory.
>
> The attorney thinks differently. The pleadings suggest
> differently. The order states differently.
>
> >On another subject, you may offer some comment to your LiveJournal
> readers
> >about our private exchanges regarding your Bedford Lyceum outing. I
> figured
> >I needed to spray paint your rook before Stanley Kurtz or Ann Coulter
> did.
>
> I can't comment because I didn't understand our private exchanges
> then and I don't now. I also don't understand the expression "spray
> paint your rook".
>
> V
>
> _______________________________________________
> The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
> Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
> UUPoly-L mailing list
> UUPoly-L@uupa.org
> http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.