Re: [UUPoly-L] UUPoly-L Digest, Vol 24, Issue 8
- To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
- Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] UUPoly-L Digest, Vol 24, Issue 8
- From: "kit of the furry heads" <rawk.yer.socks.off@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:37:16 -0000
- In-reply-to: <mailman.17.1158076810.24563.uupoly-l@uupa.org>
- References: <mailman.17.1158076810.24563.uupoly-l@uupa.org>
- Reply-to: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Timothy wrote to Valerie:
After reading your livejournal entry posting on this case, I will have to
inform you that there is no reason to think this situation is even about
polyamory.
Not having read the LJ post, I don't have the luxury of understanding why
you don't see this situation as having relevance to the polyamory community.
When my ex-wife hired an attorney is the summer of 1993 to gain custody of
our eleven year old son Matthew, she certainly knew that a live-in
boyfriend
could work against her. That's why she asked her father for $4000.00 for
an
across-state-lines body snatch.
This still sounds like a case of sexual freedom: she was less likely to gain
custody of the child because she was cohabitating with an unmarried
partner.
We do have other things to think about, besides worrying about poly folk who
did not learn anything from April Divilbiss. The rights of seven year old
girls in Uganda not to have more than one reconstructive surgery operation
on their vaginas for one thing.
Because, you know, Western feminists' work on female circumcision hasn't
been fairly racist...
--K
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.