Re: [UUPoly-L] Stirring the cultural cauldron

[wabaldwin@aol.com]

 I disagree with the statement that "pornography debases and objectifies women".

I think it can be true, but not necessarilly.

However....did I miss a definition of "pornography?"

If someone did define it here, what was it?

How do we tell "erotica" from "pornography?"

Anyone?

Bill


 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: jay m <marcus_t_cicero@hotmail.com>
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Sent: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:31 am
Subject: [UUPoly-L] Stirring the cultural cauldron










<snip>
 
My only intent was to point out that porn and polyamory are not correlated and 
that was the gist of the previous post. Also, whether you like it or not, 
pornography debased and objectifies women. Cosmopolitan and Glamour, along with 
a great deal of TV, are simply Playboy and Hustler dressed to look like a pig. 
 
<snip>




________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com