Re: [UUPoly-L] Report from PNWD AGM
Clarification: That is all I was asking of the LGBT Task Force, i.e. we, UUPA, will do our own activism.
Kathleen
Amanda Birmingham <lists@imladris.com> wrote:
Hello,
With all due respect to Kathleen (who may be speaking for the official
UUPA position), *I* am not asking only for "awareness, not acceptance
or activism". I think acceptance of consensual poly is pretty clearly
supported by UU principles, and therefore I (again, personally ... I
don't speak for UUPA) want UUs to learn about and accept poly as a
valid life choice to be celebrated in our congregations.
Of course, I realize that isn't about to happen tomorrow. But in the
long run, I'm definitely aiming for a larger goal than awareness--and I
think that it would be disingenuous for me personally to claim
differently to my congregation.
Regards,
Amanda
On Feb 26, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Kathleen Reedy wrote:
> Pres. Sinkford's reference to working toward marriage equality for
> gay/lesbian reflects the attitude I encountered at the Cedar Lane LGBT
> group; concern that our message would dilute or eclipse their action.
> However, we only ask 'awareness', not acceptance or activism, and that
> our presence as a minority be acknowledged under the 'welcoming
> congregation' umbrella. Time.............
> Kathleen
>
> Harlan White wrote:
> Hello, Polyfolk!
>
> Last weekend I attended the Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the
> Pacific Northwest District (PNWD) of the UUA. Each UUA district has an
> AGM every year, and UUPA Board Members are trying to make it to their
> local district AGM's to do some networking at the district level.
>
> This year's PNWD AGM was held in Boise ID. The keynote speaker on
> Saturday morning was none other than the UUA President, Bill Sinkford.
> He talked mainly about what factors contribute to the growth of UU
> congregations, including welcoming attitudes towards newcomers and
> advertising campaigns, which have evidently been quite successful in a
> few test markets around the country.
>
> After the keynote speech there were a number of concurrent workshops,
> one of which was called "Conversations with our Elected
> Representatives," which was essentially a 1.5 hour Q&A session with
> President Sinkford and some members of the PNWD Board. President
> Sinkford did most of the talking. Finding myself in an open forum, I
> stood up and asked a question. As best I can recall, I said something
> like this:
>
> I've been a UU since I was 12 years old, and I always come to these UU
> gatherings with a certain feeling of swelling with pride in being a
> UU. However, I have to say that I often leave with a touch of
> heartbreak. The reason for this is that I am a member of a minority.
> It's not a racial minority, or an ethnic minority, or a genderal
> minority, or a sexual preference minority. It's a philosophical
> minority. I'm a polyamorous person, and I'm in a minority because my
> philosophy of relationships holds that it is a good, healthy, and
> happy thing that my chosen family contains more than two primary
> partners. I'm particularly aware of being in a minority because last
> fall I suffered job descrimination based on my relationship
> philosophy. When I come to UU gatherings and hear speeches about our
> inclusiveness, and hear lists of all the minority groups to which my
> denomination is intentionally extending the hand of ministry, I can't
> help feeling a pang of heartbreak wondering wh!
> en, if ever, any such speaker will publically acknowledge my minority
> and declare that the hand of ministry is being consciously and
> intentionally extended to us. I guess my question is, how close do you
> think we are to something like that?
>
> The answer I got, though I can't quote it verbatim, went something
> like this:
>
> Well, I don't think we're very close at this point. The ministerial
> body is having some very serious conversations these days about the
> issues involved in ministering to Unitarians in polyamorous families.
> It's a very complicated issue for the denomination because of the
> strong stand the UUA has taken for marriage equality for same-sex
> couples. There will have to be a good deal of intimate, lower-level
> conversation about this before anything is said at the higher
> denominational level. However, I do personally know a number of people
> who have polyamorous relationships, and I respect and honor their
> relationships.
>
> This answer, while it wasn't on the face of it terribly encouraging,
> was at least I think realistic and responsive. And I was rather
> pleased that I got the UUA President to speak the word polyamory in a
> public forum with say, 80 people in the room, and to say something at
> least tentatively supportive of poly UUs and our relationships. After
> the session was over I went up and introduced myself to him and
> thanked him for his responsive and thoughtful answer to my question,
> which seemed to please him.
>
> Then another pleasing thing happened. A young woman came up to me who
> turned out to be a newly-appointed member of the PNWD Board. She asked
> me if she could have one of my poly pride buttons, and I said well, of
> course. She went on to say that she has been working for some years
> with a young adult group at her church in Eugene OR, and that
> polyamory has been a topic of much conversation and curiosity in that
> group. I asked her if any of her group were members of UUPA or
> subscribers to UUPoly-L. She said she wasn't aware of any, so I told
> her how to find our website and instructions for subscribing to the
> e-mail list. I felt that I'd made a good connection with a member of
> the district board.
>
> At another time in the weekend I got introduced to the new President
> of the PNWD Board and told him I was with UUPA. We didn't have an
> opportunity for any substative conversation.
>
> Later on, a lady from Idaho approached me to ask a question about
> polygamy. She has been concerned about Mormon splinter groups moving
> into Idaho from Canada, practicing coerced and underage marriage, and
> being involved in alleged welfare fraud. I told her that most
> contemporary polyamorists would not condone such partriarchal
> practices and were very egalitarian in their family structures. She
> asked me what was the make up of my family and I told her my household
> has two men and two women, all very independent and consensual. She
> seemed satisfied and thanked me for the information.
>
> Refreshingly, I was not the only openly poly person at the meetings. A
> woman I know somewhat, who's been active in UUPA and in her local
> church in Portland OR, was there with her two kids, and I had a
> pleasant time getting to know her better.
>
> And finally, there was one other kind of interesting thing that
> happened with regards to polyamory. On Saturday morning I had put on
> the conference bullet/message board a note saying that any poly or
> poly-curious people could call me on my cell-phone if they were
> looking for support or information. No one called, and on Sunday
> morning I happened to look at the bulletin board and noticed that my
> posting was no longer there. I went to the registration desk and asked
> if by any chance I had done something wrong which led them to take
> down my notice. The person at the desk said no, he couldn't think of
> any reason why they would have taken it down. That suggests to me that
> perhaps some individual took it down for unknown reasons, like they
> found it offensive, or they wanted to take the information with them.
> One of life's intriguing mysteries.
>
> Anyway, I've now attended two PNWD AGMs, and I've really enjoyed them.
> I really encourage folks from this list to attend such gatherings and
> enjoy them as well.
>
> Blessings,
>
> 'Storm
> _______________________________________________
> The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
> Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about
> yourself.
> UUPoly-L mailing list
> UUPoly-L@uupa.org
> http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Never miss an email again!
> Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.
> _______________________________________________
> The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
> Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about
> yourself.
> UUPoly-L mailing list
> UUPoly-L@uupa.org
> http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l
>
_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l
---------------------------------
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.