Re: [UUPoly-L] A Fun New Sex Crime



Laura Stewart wrote: (On 04:07 PM 1/26/2007)
> That's a common misconception. An organism can be alive, but unable
> or unwilling to reproduce, which takes it out of the gene pool. IMHO,
> fucking mannequins takes one out of the gene pool. (Assuming he isn't
> also trying to inseminate humans, which it sounds like he won't have
> the opportunity to do for a while.)
>
> John

That does not take one out of the gene pool.  Nor does being
exclusively homosexual.  I believe a Darwin was given to the fellow
who said he would cut off his balls if his rugby team lost, and then
did.  He actual removed himself from the gene pool via making himself
unable to reproduce.

Well, Laura, I guess I'm just more trusting than you are. I'm willing to take someone's word that they are bowing out of the gene pool, rather than demanding their 'nads.


:-)

John





This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.