Re: [UUPoly-L] A Fun New Sex Crime

["CatDeville" <catdeville@cox.net>]

The Darwin Awards have been known to give "Honorable Mention" to people who
have been incredibly stupid but have, by some vagary of circumstance
actually managed to live through it (and have not been rendered somehow
incapable of bearing young), but I've always felt that those "Honorable
Mentions" weren't qualified for their Darwin.  Having grown up around far
too many women who have again and again demonstrated that even the most
Neanderthal idiot can often find a mate and that these throwbacks invariably
breed, I strongly agree that one does not merit a Darwin unless they are a)
dead or b) sterile. (I also objected to one which was given to a poor soul
who died, not out of stupidity, but out of compassion and poor timing - but
I guess his removal did improve the gene pool, even if he was just an really
unlucky bastich.) 

Fucking mannequins does not preclude the possibility of also fucking humans,
and being sent to prison doesn't infer that one will never again have
conjugal relations with someone capable of bearing your offspring, so - I
agree with Laura - close, but no cigar. 

-----Original Message-----
From: uupoly-l-bounces+catdeville=cox.net@uupa.org
[mailto:uupoly-l-bounces+catdeville=cox.net@uupa.org] On Behalf Of John
Ullman
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:13 PM
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] A Fun New Sex Crime

Laura Stewart wrote:           (On 04:07 PM 1/26/2007)
> > That's a common misconception. An organism can be alive, but unable
> > or unwilling to reproduce, which takes it out of the gene pool. IMHO,
> > fucking mannequins takes one out of the gene pool. (Assuming he isn't
> > also trying to inseminate humans, which it sounds like he won't have
> > the opportunity to do for a while.)
> >
> > John
>
>That does not take one out of the gene pool.  Nor does being
>exclusively homosexual.  I believe a Darwin was given to the fellow
>who said he would cut off his balls if his rugby team lost, and then
>did.  He actual removed himself from the gene pool via making himself
>unable to reproduce.

Well, Laura, I guess I'm just more trusting than you are. I'm willing 
to take someone's word that they are bowing out of the gene pool, 
rather than demanding their 'nads.

:-)

John

_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l