Re: [UUPoly-L] Two concise replies (to cheating is more fun)



I like loving more.  More people, more words, more sunshine, more
antioxidants.

Always, *ALWAYS* remember, less is *LESS*. More is *MORE*. More is *BETTER*.
And twice as much is good too! Not enough is *BAD* and too much is
*NEVER*enough, unless it's just about right.
Why go for less?

On 7/6/07, Bear Drummer <beardrummer@gmail.com> wrote:

Cheating hurts partners. Polyamory works.

... 5 words...  anyone going for 4?
-----Original Message-----
From: uupoly-l-bounces+beardrummer=gmail.com@uupa.org
[mailto:uupoly-l-bounces+beardrummer=gmail.com@uupa.org] On Behalf Of
Kelly
Cookson
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 1:32 PM
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] Two concise replies (to cheating is more fun)

> > If you want to be gracious: "It depends on your definition of fun."
> > If you want to be condescending: "I'd rather be boring than a
bastard."
> >
> > Only 7 words per reply. Is there some kind of prize for most concise
>reply?
> > ;-)
>
>I can go for six:  "What's not fun about group sex?"

You beat me! ;-)
Kelly



_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l





This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.