Re: [UUPoly-L] Bloggers debating re UUA and polyamory and ensuingcomments



It is untrue that there is no scientific data at all which can be relied upon in all this. It's scanty, true, but not non-existant.
I'll contact Jim Fleckenstein of ITCR tomorrow for the best sources on this.

I've read a lot of studies dealing with open marriage. I haven't look into studies of multi-partner marriages except for the Constantine's book "Group Marriage," so I won't be much help in that area. But if you want findings and references for open marriages...let me know what kind of information you need. I may be able to help.


Hopefully some of our leaders here will get out the talking points and help bring some enlightenment into the debate. Note that Fausto is using some heavy ammo - allegations that there is no scientific evidence to support the claim that polyamory is *not* indemically fraught with "emotional and spiritual dangers".

Well, we have to be honest about the data. The fact is, many people in open marriages do see sexual monogamy as creating a lot of extra relationship work, so much that many couples decide to return to sexual monogamy. The majority of couples in open marriages report experiencing jealousy...clearly a negative experience that can be corrosive to relationships if handled poorly. And studies are mixed about open marriages ending in divorce more often. Some studies show higher rates of divorce, and other studies show the same rates of divorce as sexually monogamous marriages. No studies show open marriages lasting longer than sexually monogamous marriages. But it is also a fact that many couples in open relationships accept additional relationship work and occasional problems as part of the lifestyle. They learn to manage the difficulties and the jealousy that arise. They see the extra work as a trade-off for the benefits they get out of the open relationship. Even when an open couple returns to sexual monogamy, the partners often say they still see open relationships as a valid lifestyle for others.


It's important we use science to paint realistic pictures, and not choose selected findings to paint unrealistically positive pictures. People will eventually learn about the less positive findings and feel betrayed by unrealistically positive pictures.

Kelly

_________________________________________________________________
http://newlivehotmail.com





This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.