Re: [UUPoly-L] Bloggers debating re UUA and polyamory and ensuingcomments
It is untrue that there is no scientific data at all which can be relied
upon in all this. It's scanty, true, but not non-existant.
I'll contact Jim Fleckenstein of ITCR tomorrow for the best sources on
this.
I've read a lot of studies dealing with open marriage. I haven't look into
studies of multi-partner marriages except for the Constantine's book "Group
Marriage," so I won't be much help in that area. But if you want findings
and references for open marriages...let me know what kind of information you
need. I may be able to help.
Hopefully some of our leaders here will get out the talking points and help
bring some enlightenment into the debate. Note that Fausto is using some
heavy ammo - allegations that there is no scientific evidence to support
the claim that polyamory is *not* indemically fraught with "emotional and
spiritual dangers".
Well, we have to be honest about the data. The fact is, many people in open
marriages do see sexual monogamy as creating a lot of extra relationship
work, so much that many couples decide to return to sexual monogamy. The
majority of couples in open marriages report experiencing jealousy...clearly
a negative experience that can be corrosive to relationships if handled
poorly. And studies are mixed about open marriages ending in divorce more
often. Some studies show higher rates of divorce, and other studies show the
same rates of divorce as sexually monogamous marriages. No studies show open
marriages lasting longer than sexually monogamous marriages. But it is also
a fact that many couples in open relationships accept additional
relationship work and occasional problems as part of the lifestyle. They
learn to manage the difficulties and the jealousy that arise. They see the
extra work as a trade-off for the benefits they get out of the open
relationship. Even when an open couple returns to sexual monogamy, the
partners often say they still see open relationships as a valid lifestyle
for others.
It's important we use science to paint realistic pictures, and not choose
selected findings to paint unrealistically positive pictures. People will
eventually learn about the less positive findings and feel betrayed by
unrealistically positive pictures.
Kelly
_________________________________________________________________
http://newlivehotmail.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.