Re: [UUPoly-L] Mass. minister lays down the gauntlet

[Anarchamama <anarchamama@yahoo.com>]

Kimberly,

I appreciate your comments and they sit well with me. This is what I understand UU to be.

Cecily

KN Gier <jwncrow@hotmail.com> wrote: Wait.  What if everybody took the initiative to define their relationships 
on their own terms, with input from all people involved, with negotiation 
and compromise expected as part of the deal?  What if everybody felt 
comfortable to take the path that led to the best possible outcome for 
themselves and their partner(s) (if any), as they saw it?  What if everybody 
was free to make their own choices about loving, consensual relationships?

I don't know what that minister's on about, but I'm in favor of everybody 
doing just exactly that.  That doesn't necessarily mean that everybody would 
have polyamorous relationships, by any stretch of the imagination.  It 
doesn't work for everybody, and it's not appealing to everybody.  But I see 
no reason why everybody ought not to have the option to go that way if 
they're so inclined (and the corresponding responsibilities).

So yeah.  What if everybody did that?  We'd all have to think and 
communicate clearly about our love lives.  In the immortal words of the 
Internet: OH NOES!

-- Kimberly
(I'm new here.)

_________________________________________________________________
http://liveearth.msn.com

_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l



Cecily Arenas, RN, MSN, CNL

See my Triathlon/travel blog:
http://www.birthing-journey.blogspot.com
 



       
---------------------------------
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.