Re: [UUPoly-L] Bloggers debating re UUA and polyamory and ensuingcomments

[JasmineGld@aol.com]

In a message dated 7/9/2007 3:42:02 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
mnstrm@erosong.net writes:

> I think it wise not to give these bloggers more attention than they  
deserve.  

I agree it's important to carefully choose where and when  and how to respond 
to blogs. Some of them need to be ignored, no matter how  inflammatory they 
are. I know LT, and I've had conversations with him in  the past. I am 
delighted to have a chance to further the conversation with him.  I have responded to 
his blog. It's long.  

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=30935807&postID=779020229807355909

>  I also think it's wise not to get pulled in by their rhetorical 
> tactic of trying to turn dialog about polyamory into controversy 
> about legalizing plural marriage.  
 
I absolutely agree. UUPoly was created to work on issues of inclusion and  
the closet within UUism. We need to keep focused. As 'Storm said: 
 
> We have enough good stuff to talk about in the everyday 
> real experience of being poly in UU congregations.  We 
> do not need to help these bloggers portray us as trying to
> push the UUA into a contentious political advocacy.
 
Jasmine 
 
 



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.