Re: [UUPoly-L] Addressing a common argument of anti-poly rhetoric

[WABaldwin@aol.com]

I think anyone making such an argument should be required to come up with 
specific examples of why they consider something "inevitable".
 
Often the "something" is not inevitable at all.  They've simply assumed it 
is, without thinking much about it.
 
That's my impression, anyway...
 
Many of the same "arguments" would seem to apply to extended 
families....(which people don't seem to be opposed to at all!)
 
Bill
 
<<
 
In a message dated 7/17/2007 6:52:58 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
gentlemonster@lycos.com writes:

The line of argument is that, with the stresses of having to juggle two or
more co-spouses, the children in a poly household will inevitably become
neglected or exposed to negative influences. 

>>



************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour