Re: [UUPoly-L] Identity Polytics.

[WABaldwin@aol.com]

In a message dated 6/2/2007 5:25:38 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
kc62301@hotmail.com writes:

But again, can a person be a polyamorist (lower case P) and not be a 
Polyamorist (upper case P)? And if so, since non-poly people don't make 
caveats, is it fair to label people on a descriptive basis?

Hm -- But of course!! -- Obviously!!!
 
Just like someone can be a unitarian but not a Unitarian! (or a universlist 
but not a Universalist!!!)
 
(or a catholic but not a Catholic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
 
;^)
Bill



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.