Re: [UUPoly-L] Identity Polytics.

["Earth Father" <earthfather@cfnc.us>]

> In a message dated 6/2/2007 5:25:38 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> kc62301@hotmail.com writes:
> 
> But again, can a person be a polyamorist (lower case P) and not be a
> Polyamorist (upper case P)? And if so, since non-poly people don't make
> caveats, is it fair to label people on a descriptive basis?
> 
> Hm -- But of course!! -- Obviously!!!

My question is whether there is such a thing as a Polyamorist-- at least in any
significant numbers.  (There's always a nut job of whatever description
*somewhere*.)

> 
> Just like someone can be a unitarian but not a Unitarian! (or a universlist
> but not a Universalist!!!)
> 
> (or a catholic but not a Catholic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

My tastes are decidedly catholic, but certainly not Catholic!

Michael Rios

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.6/828 - Release Date: 6/1/2007 11:22
AM