Re: [UUPoly-L] Identity Polytics.
On 6/2/07, Kelly Cookson <kc62301@hotmail.com> wrote:
Thoughtful polyamorists like yourselves are careful. But non-poly folks may
not share your insights and assume whatever they read about polyamory
describes me. "Hey, isn't Kelly into that polyamory stuff? Check out this
article on polyamory." And polyamorists can assume I share their beliefs
because they consider me polyamorist. Here's an example: I was talking with
a self-identified polyamorist about the concept of jealousy in the O'Neills'
book, Open Marriage. I said the O'Neill's believe jealousy reflects
insecurity and possessiveness we acquire from socially learned ideas about
monogamy. He agreed. He was really suprised that I didn't agree. Jealousy
appears in every known culture, and jealousy appears in infants as young as
6 months old. There's more to jealousy than social learning about monogamy.
(Another story...) The point is, because he considered me a polyamorist, he
assumed I would agree with ideas in books about polyamory such as Open
Marriage.
I've encountered similar situations to this. I suspect most people on
this list have as well.
I've had people assume that I have primary and secondary relationships
and ask which of my partners is my primary and be surprised when I say
that we are all primary to one another and that I "don't really do
secondary relationships". I've had people correct me when I say I am
a polygamist wich "don't you mean polyamorist?" and be surprised when
I say "yes, but I also believe in multiple MARRIAGE, so I am also
polygamist". I've had people be surprised that I'm into the idea of
marriage at all. But most significantly, I've had people be surprised
that I don't do things the way they do or believe things the way they
do with different people with contradictory beliefs. It's not that
there's a "standard" polyamory with variations. It seems to be that
people have a tendency to believe that other people are the same as
them. I'm sure the people who thought that I must have one "open
relationship" and the people who thought that I must not be into
marriage or any sort of committed quasi-ownership type relationship
would be quite surprised at each other.
-Laura
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.