Re: [UUPoly-L] Identity Polytics.

["Laura Stewart" <mathlaura@gmail.com>]

On 6/2/07, Earth Father <earthfather@cfnc.us> wrote:
> > In a message dated 6/2/2007 5:25:38 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> > kc62301@hotmail.com writes:
> >
> > But again, can a person be a polyamorist (lower case P) and not be a
> > Polyamorist (upper case P)? And if so, since non-poly people don't make
> > caveats, is it fair to label people on a descriptive basis?
> >
> > Hm -- But of course!! -- Obviously!!!
>
> My question is whether there is such a thing as a Polyamorist-- at least in any
> significant numbers.  (There's always a nut job of whatever description
> *somewhere*.)

I'm on the side of there's no such thing as a Polyamorist with a
capital P.  Unless it's self-identified, and no one else need or
probably would acknowledge the difference.

-Laura