Re: [UUPoly-L] Identity Polytics.
- To: <uupoly-l@uupa.org>
- Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] Identity Polytics.
- From: "David Hall" <airsafe1@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:40:27 -0000
- In-reply-to: <21048949.1180881350532.JavaMail.root@m35>
- Reply-to: uupoly-l@uupa.org
- Thread-index: Acel4mk6Ghm3krD2RkGJZC/v4sIzhAACQ7bgAAhtTiA=
As a self-proclaimed Itinerant Polyamorist (as in many LDRs over the years)
I've used the term for a long time. As for monogamy, as I age with my
darling wife, we have always agreed that if no one else wants us, mono is a
fine default condition for us.
Word play can be fun.
Dave Hall
-----Original Message-----
On Behalf Of Earth Father
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anita Wagner
.
>
> Polyamorist is a natural way to refer to we who are not monogamists.
> Monogamist is a very common term, at least in my observation
<grin> This may reflect the circles you hang out in, which is *highly*
activist and political (though not partisan. And I appreciate all the good
work that you do, Anita-- I'm glad you're out there for all of us.
OTOH, I would be unlikely to use the term monogamist, for the same reason I
would rarely use "polyamorist"-- the implication would be that it was
someone who was *committed* to a particular viewpoint, and it sets up an
"us-against-them" context, which I try to avoid.
I know folks who are currently monogamous, and others who are currently
poly, and I acknowledge that this could shift without notice for anyone.
Why, monogamy has even crossed my mind for *very* brief moments! ;-)
Michael Rios
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.7/829 - Release Date: 6/2/2007 5:26
PM
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.