Re: [UUPoly-L] Friends (Quakers), sexuality and polyamory...what would you say to this?
Thank you Kelly. That's a lot to digest...although I'm not sure how it specifically addresses my interest to bring support of polyamorous relationships into discussion. Maybe you can clarify that. As for polyamory and spirituality as it speaks to me...........my re-embracing of polyamory is directly related to a fuller and deeper spiritual opening in myself. Polyamory is an expression of how my spirit feels moved to experience deep, intimate connection with others, and to love expansively. It is also a necessity for my study and practice of a tantric path.
Namaste': Tara
(in Lancaster PA)
Tara's page - http://360.yahoo.com/tara_affinity - a sacred living, sex-/poly-positive exploration
Meet Up for Lancaster Poly-Tantra - http://tantric.meetup.com/14/
Yahoo Group for Lancaster Poly-Tantra - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LAPTN
----- Original Message ----
From: Kelly Cookson <kc62301@hotmail.com>
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2007 2:11:24 PM
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] Friends (Quakers), sexuality and polyamory...what would you say to this?
>From the essay at Quakersong.org:
"Some couples believe that they can love each other whole-heartedly and also
support each othersʼ sexual intimacy with others. Many Friends have seen
abundant evidence that faith communities blessing life-long same gender
unions bears spiritual fruit. I personally have not encountered evidence
that group marriage or open marriage in any of the above forms has any
spiritual benefit. On the contrary, I have seen significant evidence that
sexual intimacy outside of the marriage relationship undermines in a
fundamental way oneʼs capacity to love oneʼs life partner with all oneʼs
heart."
I was generally put off the essay. Nevertheless, I see a kernal of truth in
the paragraph above.
What few studies are available suggest that the odds are stacked against
people who decide to try sexually open relationships. Sure, some sexually
open couples have satisfying relationships that last a lifetime. My spouse
and I have been sexually open the entire 23 years of our marriage; we are
happy and plan to stay sexually open the rest of our lives. But we also
consider ourselves a couple of oddballs. Although studies are too limited to
allow firm conclusions, the evidence so far suggests most couples who try
open marriage eventually return to monogamy or break up. They tend to
experience a bump up in staisfaction when they first open their
relationships. But the longer they try to maintain the open relationship,
the more likely they run into the problems sexual non-monogamy can create.
These problems can be very serious and threatening to the relationship.
Moreover, the effects of these problems can accumulate over time. Sexual
non-monogamy, over time, for many or most couples, erodes psychological
bonds and attachments. They start seeing costs of sexual non-monogamy as
outweighing the benefits of sexual non-monogamy. So they either quit being
sexually non-monogamous or they quit being a couple. (If anyone wants the
studies and sources that have led me to these views, I will be happy to give
details. I'm at work now and not close to my personal library.)
Would I recommend anyone try sexually open marriage? No. I could not in good
conscious recommend people try something when I honestly believe their
chances of success are poor. But people are going to try it anyway. I would
like to see more tolerance when people make this decision, even if it's not
the decision most would make.
I think--and this is pure opinion--two things are required to have a
sexually open relationship that remains satisfying and lasts a lifetime.
First, something in the core of your personality must yearn for a sexually
non-monogamous lifestyle. For me, that core personality characteristic is
bisexuality. I want the freedom to experience all aspects of my bisexual
orientation. I could not imagine living the rest of my life having sex with
just women or just men. I would rather deal with the problems and occasional
heartaches that come with a sexually non-monogamous lifestyles than not
express my bisexuality fully. For other people, it may be something other
than bisexuality. But if you're going into open marriage because you've
grown bored with your current partner, or you just want to experience the
thrill of it, or you've read a book and thought the ideas sounded
credible...good luck. You'll need it.
Second, you have to develop skills in maintaining emotional bonds and
psychological attachments. If you want your relationship to stay together
through the rough periods, you need to maintain: (a) your ability to have
fun together, (b) your sense of emotional closeness or intimacy, and (c)
your sense of having a secure attachment to each other. Many people fail to
maintain these aspects of their relationships. They either don't realize how
important they are, or they don't know what to do in order to maintain them.
If you think honesty and good communication is all you need...again, good
luck. You'll need it.
If I wanted to put my opnion into "spiritual" terms...and I'm going to
regret this, I know it...I'd say you better have a feeling that God has
destined you and created you to have a sexually non-monogamous lifestyle,
and thereby God has challenged you through the school of hard knocks to
become more skilled than most at developing and maintaining close
relationships. If you take these relationship skills and apply them to
helping people outside your marriage, then maybe sexually open marriage
could be part of a spiritual path.
My two cents.
Kelly
_________________________________________________________________
Get a preview of Live Earth, the hottest event this summer - only on MSN
http://liveearth.msn.com?source=msntaglineliveearthhm
_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l
____________________________________________________________________________________
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.