Re: [UUPoly-L] Report from PNWD AGM

[Victor Raymond <vraymond@iastate.edu>]

At 04:13 PM 3/1/2007, you wrote:

> Before I even begin to respond in detail to your post, let me clarify
> what I am saying.  My point is this:
>
> I can see no logical reason to not tolerate and accept someone being
> visible about a 24/7 D/S relationship at church.

...except that - depending on the behavior involved in such a 
relationship - it is perfectly reasonable to *remind* people in such 
relationships that consenting to witnessing it is not a good thing to 
*assume*.  In a sense, there is a distinct courtesy involved 
here.  All I was trying to do was to show how this might affect 
people who are not kinky and give them some basis for interpreting 
and interacting with people who are.


> You seem to be explaining why people are not visible with their 24/7
> D/S relationships.  This was not a topic that I was at all in
> ignorance about.  It is also 100% irrelevent to my point.

I'm sorry if it seems that way to you - I see your point and the 
point I am attempting to make as complementary to one another.


> If you have some point that contradicts or disagrees with my point,
> please let me know, and I will respond to it.  Otherwise it seems that
> we're talking about totally different things.

I'm sorry that you see this as totally different things.  I see them 
as being completely intertwined with one another, and deserve more 
consideration and thought.  I'm sorry if I offended you, and it may 
be that we'll have to agree to disagree about this.



Victor J Raymond
vraymond "at"  iastate.edu

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.5/706 - Release Date: 2/28/2007 4:09 PM