Re: [UUPoly-L] New blog post worth reading

["Peter RF Baxter" <baxterp@meer.net>]

Yes, I'm sorry I wasn't more clear: it was not Anita's post or even the 
blogpost she linked to, it was a tertiary link from that blog that seemed 
like it might be Evil.

As for the blogpost itself, I guess I can see your/the author's point. Seems 
a roundabout way to get there -- but I guess I should cut them some "SLACK!"

-- Peter

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anita Wagner" <imapolygirl@yahoo.com>
To: <uupoly-l@uupa.org>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] New blog post worth reading


> OK, Peter, thanks for warning us all.  I assume you are referring to the 
> blog post and not mine to this list (on my way out the door with no time 
> to check it).  I don't know if I would have recognized the signs, whatever 
> they are.
>
> I think the blogger was drawing an analogy between UU arguments that 
> villify satanists and pagans and the ones that villify or discriminate 
> against polyfolk.  It was the second half of the post that seemed like a 
> good argument - definitely in our favor.
>
> Anita
<backlog snipped - p.b.>