[UUPoly-L] Labels
- To: <uupoly-l@uupa.org>
- Subject: [UUPoly-L] Labels
- From: David Anderson <iulawboy@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:57:45 -0000
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <mailman.15.1217606417.15289.uupoly-l@uupa.org>
- References: <mailman.15.1217606417.15289.uupoly-l@uupa.org>
- Reply-to: uupoly-l@uupa.org
I understand stargazngal's unwillingness to fully define her relationship, expecilly as it is evolving. I too have difficulty pinning down a label on me in so many areas of my life - especially when I live on the boundry between two groups. That said, David Vanhorn nails it when he reminds us that when you attempt to communicate with others labels are a necessisty. Refusing to label at all means that you will have a hard time communicating your feelings/needs/ideas with others. I need to be able to say "sit in that chair" rather than "sit in that thing over there that looks like it might be comfortable to sit on but as I don't want to limit its being, I refuse to give it a name."
As for myself - I still don't consider myself a practicing poly person -- mostly because I'm not sure how to be that freeking honest with people and fear the rejection. So I've limited myself to open relationships that work mostly, but I end up suppressing my true feelings. I'm learning to be more honest with myself (I have a capacity and need to be in love with more than one person at a time) and hopefully will someday be able to share that realization with the people I am with.
--David A.
From: "david vanhorn" <polydvh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] Open Marriage
To: stargazngal@yahoo.com, uupoly-l@uupa.org
Message-ID:
<b025843b0807311012p2f71d9dfu8c1a488f739a61fe@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
yes, labels are very limiting.
But necessary, if you're going to talk about it.
--
www.hai.org poly-friendly workshops on love, sex, and intimacy.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.