Re: [UUPoly-L] a troublesome thought
In a message dated 11/9/2008 9:06:55 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
licorice.gumdrop@gmail.com writes:
> not if the passage of all the state-level defense of marriage
> amendments are any indication.
Take a look at the rest of the story.
The 2000 California ballot measure limiting marriage was approved by 61% of
voters. California's 2008 constitutional amendment to do the same thing has
only 52.3% of voters in unofficial results. They're still counting ballots.
That's a big shift in the right direction. Not a big enough shift, albeit;
but it's still progress.
In this line of work, we have to remember to celebrate the baby steps.
Jasmine
**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other
Holiday needs. Search Now.
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http://searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.