Re: [UUPoly-L] a troublesome thought



 
In a message dated 11/9/2008 9:06:55 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
licorice.gumdrop@gmail.com writes:

> not  if the passage of all the state-level defense of marriage  
>  amendments are any indication.



Take a look at the rest of the story. 
 
The 2000 California ballot measure limiting marriage was approved  by 61% of 
voters. California's 2008 constitutional amendment to do the same  thing has 
only 52.3% of voters in unofficial results. They're still counting  ballots. 
 
That's a big shift in the right direction. Not a big enough shift, albeit;  
but it's still progress. 
 
In this line of work, we have to remember to celebrate the baby steps. 
 
Jasmine 
 
 
**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other 
Holiday needs. Search Now. 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http://searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)




This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.