[UUPoly-L] Back to the Law (was RE: Rational skepticism (was:"law" of attraction))

["Catherine Deville" <catdeville@cox.net>]

Michael said: 
<<And of course, anytime it doesn't happen, either you haven't been patient
enough, or you aren't *really* a true believer-- you're not doing it right,
somehow.  The entire thing is set up to be untestable.>>

LOL... actually, it's not set up to be untestable... it simply *is*
untestable.  Such as statement implies that the folks who have been
promoting awareness of the "Law of Attraction" invented it.  That
demonstrates a high level of ignorance of what the Law of Attraction is, not
just how it works. 

<<There is also a certain "pyramid scheme" element to this.>>

OK... you've piqued my curiosity. Ignoring the fact that you just
demonstrated that you haven't a clue about the Law of Attraction or how it
works, please explain to me how it is a "pyramid scheme"?