Re: [UUPoly-L] Rational skepticism (was:"law" of attraction)

[Timothy McKee <mknd17@hotmail.com>]

and if there are more than two points of view on *the law of attraction* whatever the hell that is so be it.  i read bret easton ellis's book *the rules of attraction* and don't feel like doing any wiki on that subject either.Tim

> From: cwlee@post.harvard.edu> To: uupoly-l@uupa.org> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 14:34:34 -0700> Subject: Re: [UUPoly-L] Rational skepticism (was:"law" of attraction)> > > I agree completely with one of the two principal posters on > this topic, and largely disagree with the other. However, I > believe the topic has moved far beyond poly issues and > experiences. I suggest that the thread be continued either > privately offline, or in another, more suitable, venue.> > Let's get back to the semantics of "deflowering". :-)> > Best regards to all. > > _______________________________________________> The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.> Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.> UUPoly-L mailing list> UUPoly-L@uupa.org> http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l