Re: [UUPoly-L] Epistemology and Polyamory

[WABaldwin@aol.com]

Yes, dear.
 
I was trained as a scientist (physicist), so I appreciate your desire to  
quantify, measure, objectify.
 
But how people feel *is* also an observable.  The question is how to  
quantify and objectify it and measure it.
 
I also do not think that most people want to, or should be expected to,  
argue epistemology.  I'm glad to let the philosophers do that.  I will  simply put 
in my two cents now and then, not as a trained philosopher, but  simply as a 
person.
 
Bill
 
In a message dated 9/29/2008 5:49:57 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
deafraven@aol.com writes:

Don't  ask me how but this got me to thinking that there's a weaknness to 
every  method of investigation for example I would think that science would me  
limited to underestanding love in the sense it could only measure physical  
traits, descrine and explain possible behavior and other outside and possibly  
pyschological guesswork but bottom line I guess is we all come to decide what  
love or any abstract emotion by how we interpret and apply it to our lives,  
not just on what people think.  Hmmm?





**************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial 
challenges?  Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and 
calculators.      (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)