[UUPoly-L] New Article: What If Marriage Is Bad For Us?
- To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
- Subject: [UUPoly-L] New Article: What If Marriage Is Bad For Us?
- From: John Ullman <jsu627@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:20:38 -0000
- In-reply-to: <SNT102-W5273FBF23360EF965CAB2BC5D80@phx.gbl>
- References: <SNT102-W5273FBF23360EF965CAB2BC5D80@phx.gbl>
- Reply-to: uupoly-l@uupa.org
This is in the current issue of Chronicle of Higher Education. I saw
it on the Alternatives to Marriage Project ATMP-TALK list. (To
subscribe to ATMP-TALK, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTS.NETSPACE.ORG
that says (in the message text) SUB ATMP-TALK. )
http://chronicle.com/article/What-if-Marriage-Is-Bad-for/48640/
Since it is a pay per view article, I've taken a paragraph to give
you the gist of it. The overall idea is that marriage might not
really provide the benefits it's supporters tout, and a lot of people
seem to have figured that out.
What If Marriage Is Bad For Us? by Laurie Essig and Lynn Owens,
sociology faculty at Middlebury College
Too often we are presented with the false choice between a lifelong,
loving marriage and a lonely, unmarried life. But those are far from
the only options. We should consider the way people actually live:
serial monogamy, polyamory, even polygamy.
Instead of "blaming the victims" for failing to adopt the formative
lifestyles of the white and middle class, we should consider that
those avoiding marriage might know exactly what they are doing.
Marriage is not necessarily good for all of us, and it might even be
bad for most of us. When there is broad, seemingly unanimous support
for an institution, and when the institution is propped up by such
disparate ideas as love, civil rights, and wealth creation, we should
wonder why so many different players seem to agree so strongly.
Perhaps it's because they are supporting not just marriage but also
the status quo.
John U
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.