Re: [UUPoly-L] more naysayers

["Christine Heinsohn" <kb4wyr@fhrd.net>]

You know, Minx did a rant on this fellow during a recent Polyamory Weekly
Podcast.

What I found interesting about this is Fagan's total lack of understanding
about how the folks practicing polyamory use the word.  I think his
co-opting of the language shows not how small our influence is, but how
great the fear that polyamory might actually resonate with a large
population.  Throughout the excerpts that I heard the resonate theme was
that polyamory nullified the effects of the established patriarchy.  In
essence he sees polyamory as a feminist movement.  That Rocks!

Christine Heinsohn
Elmdale, Kansas

Heart of the Flint Hills Aviation
Hot Air Balloon Rides in 
"Conflict of Interest"

Traveling Chef
"Have Knives. Will Travel!"

-----Original Message-----
From: uupoly-l-bounces+kb4wyr=fhrd.net@uupa.org
[mailto:uupoly-l-bounces+kb4wyr=fhrd.net@uupa.org] On Behalf Of Sandra
Griffin
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:18 PM
To: uupoly-l@uupa.org
Subject: [UUPoly-L] more naysayers



 


Dear Abby's response may not "set the movement back at least a decade"

but articles like this one could possibly have that effect...

http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/09/21/how-monogamous-men
-can-rescue-civilization/ 
 
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Insert movie times and more without leaving HotmailR.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutori
al_QuickAdd_062009
_______________________________________________
The UUPoly-L mailing list has public archives.
Please keep that in mind when deciding how much to reveal about yourself.
UUPoly-L mailing list
UUPoly-L@uupa.org
http://www.uupa.org/mailman/listinfo/uupoly-l